Gear: Interceptor Body Armor

Product Information

Interceptor_body_armor_max192w

Interceptor Body Armor

Category: Duty & Tactical Gear
Subcategory: Personal Protection
Average Rating:
  •  
Description:

Interceptor is a type of body armor fielded by the U.S. military. It is more effective than traditional bulletproof vests and is currently replacing a previous version of body armor known as Personnel Armor System for Ground Troops (PASGT). Materials for Interceptor were developed by DARPA in the 1990s and a contract for production was awarded to DHB Industries' Point Blank Body Armor, Inc by the U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center.

Member Reviews

  • Pitman_photo_-_06_april__06_max30
    usafsp12, Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:13:34 UTC.

    Cumbersome and uncomfortable, chaffing the neck continuously. But does it offer fragmentation protection? Yes, so I'll shut up and color.

    Flag as inappropriate
    1st review
  • Tattoo__13__max30
    Johnnie513, Sun, 25 Nov 2007 08:33:19 UTC.

    This product deserves this rating because it is a complete life saver.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Images_max30
    MPdaddy, Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:47:01 UTC.

    have to agree with the first post, this gear is heavy and cumbersom. it has weak spots on the sides. we even had to wear the DAPS attachments and it was all around uncomfortable. guys wound up leaving parts of the armor in thier tents which defeats the purpose. dont get me wrong it will stop some bullets- only if its worn right.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Mpcorps_regimentalcrest_max30
    BJJMP, Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:35:27 UTC.

    I wore it and like MPDaddy said and the other person, it is heavy and it doesn't provide protection 100 percent of the time. They are adding so much to it that it is weighing down the soldier too much, there is a fine line between manuverability and protection... I couldn't even get down in the turret with the new daps i was told to wear.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Camp_shelby_077_resize_max30
    rlh11bravo, Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:53:31 UTC.

    It will stop just about anything, so for that I give it props. But it is heavy and bulky especially when you have all your ammo attached to it. It gets even heaver and bulkier when you add the side plates and sholder protection. It chafes your neck, and chokes you when you have the throat guard on, it is painful to wear for long peirods of time and absolutly sucks to wear in the heat (like say Iraq).

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Homecoming_pics_076_max30
    DevilDog_JW, Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:42:01 UTC.

    I HATED this thing until I went to Iraq

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Newhk_max30
    jcsaathoff, Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:39:20 UTC.

    LOL uncomfortable yes... but it was better than the flack jackets we had whent i first came in!

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 200589430149_0_1_-_copy_max30
    joepr, Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:27:56 UTC.

    i use over iraq really works and i buy one for me in part because my depart after a year dint issue one for me

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Tribal_dragon_tattoo_max30
    zipper, Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:04:43 UTC.

    it saves lives but before it has to be worn right and it has to be hit in the right places but me i would prefer dragonhide armor that stuff can take steel core rounds

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Asdasd_max30
    Simmons_136, Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:44:40 UTC.

    I don't particularly care for it.....pushed on my bladder too much.......i give it props for the SAPI plates...stopping 7.62 and shanks all but the kevlar only stops 9mm....my second chance vest can stop a .45 and .350 low velocity....... the compnay cares more about quantity than quality......the Army is pretty much the only service using it now....Marines came up with their own and the Air force went to Dragon Skin.......we need to up grade.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • 1stlar_logo_max30
    okc_marine, Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:34:32 UTC.

    i know 2 Marine who were KIA because their flaks failed them. But then again i know Marines whos flaks did their job. It is bulky, cumbersome, some assembly required, now they have side SAPIs for them and the Army has arm covers so these things just get heavier. my neck would usually hurt from the neck yolk, the "nut guard" could cause much pain if your not careful, or if you have people who like to play pranks. even though mine served me good, this system needs a bit more tuning.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Wfoavatar_max30
    DocThomas, Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:04:59 UTC.

    I have to agree with some of the previous poster's on this product. It's cumbersome and uncomfortable and only does a marginal job of stopping bullets and/or shrapnel, but it's also better than nothing.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Jt_and_trav_normal_max30
    LawdawgTRAV, Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:12:12 UTC.

    I have to say with having worn a Vietnam-era flak vest upon the invasion of Iraq, the IBA was a God send. It is cumbersome, it is heavy and I really don't care for all of the attachments they have now, as it limits mobility, but I feel very conident and protected when I wore it overseas. Especially after seein an enemy sniper shoot a soldier with a high-caliber rifle at less than 100 meters. The soldier fell and got right back up. The SAPI plates are heavy, but well worth the weight!!!! (Oh and those badgys, yeah they were, um, BUSTED!)

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Washington_flag_max30
    jmagloro, Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:32:41 UTC.

    Survivability vs. mobility. It deffinately works but slows you down. I would prefer a plate carrier and light plates.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Tblj_max30
    cmac1973, Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:07:46 UTC.

    It wroked in Afghanistan

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Rockstar_max30
    usk9af, Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:19:44 UTC.

    This has helped me on more than one occasion. Can get heavy and is rather hot but allows full mobility.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Img_1288_max30
    rghstkcwby, Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:05:06 UTC.

    this go thot & heavy while in Irag but sure saved a few lives!!

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Mandalorian_crest_max30
    vanguard69, Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:30:40 UTC.

    Worn by myself and some of the FINEST people in the country.... US Army.. uncomfortable and some times a pain in the butt.... but if you wanna come home you best take care of her cuz she'll get you there

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Patrol_pic1_max30
    SSchmitz, Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:26:44 UTC.

    And its a great work out.....

    Flag as inappropriate
  • P1000213_max30
    tazbury, Mon, 05 May 2008 21:28:59 UTC.

    This vest saved my life 3 times in Iraq. I f I were not wearing it I would not be writeing this review. This system realy works well.It might be a little bulky, but it will get you back home to your loved ones.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • _2nd_infantry_patch_1_revised_max30
    musker412, Mon, 12 May 2008 01:56:23 UTC.

    Would ya rather sweat or bleed? Hot and heavy, but I seen 'em stop some fast movers!!!

    Flag as inappropriate
  • P2190017_max30
    Buddylaw, Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:33:51 UTC.

    Not bad until they start adding on all of the extras that were after thoughts. The underarm protection and all of that. I prefer the IOTV that we are getting now. But the inerceptor works.
    That is really all the discussion should be about the rest is just comfort issues.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • P6180123_max30
    shepherdg, Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:48:06 UTC.

    Hot, uncomfortable, and cumbersome are all great ways to describe it. And I can agree but it works. The Air Force didnt go to Dragon Skin armour. I wish.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Bunnie_foo_foo_max30
    Browneye120, Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:27:52 UTC.

    Heavy, uncomfortable and doesn't breathe. But MOLLE straps help to place mag pouches and stuff where I want them to be and it protected me from high velocity lead poisoning.

    Flag as inappropriate
  • Dpsbadg_max30
    aztrooper, Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:07:40 UTC.

    Heavy and uncomfortable, however, I have seen soldiers who lived because of theirs. I wouldn't go into combat without armor

    Flag as inappropriate