General Forums >> The Lobby >> Death Scene Photos on Internet

Rate

Death Scene Photos on Internet

565 Views
22 Replies Flag as inappropriate
Ou_sooners_max50

616 posts

back to top

Posted 2 months ago

 

What do you think of death scene photographs that are leaked and later show up on the internet or in mass-forwarded emails?  I have seen a few of these, including one of a local motorcyclist (in Tulsa) who hit the back of a  stationary semi-truck while doing somewhere around 120 mph.  The last time I saw the email, someone had changed the typed information to claim this kid lived because he was wearing a helmet.  He didn't.  His family was very upset about the photographs being circulated.  However, I don't think anyone was able to determine who took the photos (i.e. local cop, Trooper, EMSA, etc.) or who initiated the distribution.


I'm curious as to how people feel about this and whether or not they feel differently depending on:  the cause of death, whether or not the person was under the influence of anything, whether or not this was a law enforcement brother or sister depicted, etc.  Does anyone have any ideas as to how to limit the number of people taking photos (in the day of cell phone cameras), etc., without having an officer stationed right by the body the whole time?


 

Monkey_shocked_face_max50

867 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

While I think it is terrible that people post stuff like that, I am unfortunately guilty of looking whenever I stumble upon an email like that.  Must be the morbid curiosity and inquisitiveness from all the years OTJ.  I am also guilty of forwarding them to see who gets the sickest from them.  I know it's probably wrong but lets face it, we are cops and I know I'm not the only guilty one.


As far as controlling who takes pictures, nobody should be able to get close enough once PD is on scene to get any photos.  Unfortunately it does happen but if your scene is wrapped up tight enough it should control the problem.  If I catch someone trying to snap photos like that at a scene not only are they getting an earful but I can guarantee they won't be keeping the pics on their camera or cellphone either!!!


Police work- the greatest show on earth and my team always wins!!!
Tulips and Trolls- one in the same but without them what fun would I have?

Shea_and_miss_anya_max50

236 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

I have to agree with Chimp, but having discussed this situation many times in my classes (because the issue does come up), with friends who are attorneys, and as an EMT I can tell you these pictures get out.  You'll have someone there, usually a reporter, with a really good camera who can get a couple of good shots then they wind up in the general public's view.  Unfortunately, and this comes from what I have learned and from my friends, these photo hogs are protected by the Constitution (1st Ammendment). 


 


I will find myself looking at death photos mostly because my curiosity gets peaked and I guess that's why a majority of people look at them...natural human curiosity.  On the other hand you will also have a small group that will argue "What's so different about looking at these death photos compared to looking at death photos of those who died years or even centuries ago?"  I've heard it before.


 


Personally, I believe that taking these photos and then having them published for financial gain or sending them out because you are bored or trying to impress people and not realizing that this is going to hurt the family and friends of that person or persons in those photos just because you are praticing your right to be an idiot...WRONG.


Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
-Albert Einstein

2_normal_max600_max50

336 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

You cannot really stop people from taking pics. Especially with their cell phones. The key is effective and complete scene management. If people can't get close enought then they have no picture. The ACLU jerks would cry "freedom of the press" and other excuses.


The funny thing is that we have gotten in trouble more than once at fatals, when the looky loos insist on looking and then phone in a complaint because "little Johnny" saw a dead person.


The don't look, stupid and shield your precious cargo from the harsh realitys of life.


Also, Chimp, at least here, we don't dare try and take someone's camera or film.

Ou_sooners_max50

616 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

I'm not really talking about by-standers taking photos and sending them out, but more along the lines of local cops, Troopers, EMSA, and other emergency response personnel.  These photos are not necessarily the "official" crime scene photos, but possibly just souveniers.  I've known several cops who always took personal photos of their crime scenes, especially when death was involved.


I admit I have looked at the emails and forwarded some to a select few.  I wasn't in a police capacity, however.  Was it wrong of me to do so?  Maybe.  I only forwarded to cops, so maybe not.

Shea_and_miss_anya_max50

236 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

shellgame says ...



I'm not really talking about by-standers taking photos and sending them out, but more along the lines of local cops, Troopers, EMSA, and other emergency response personnel.  These photos are not necessarily the "official" crime scene photos, but possibly just souveniers.  I've known several cops who always took personal photos of their crime scenes, especially when death was involved.


I admit I have looked at the emails and forwarded some to a select few.  I wasn't in a police capacity, however.  Was it wrong of me to do so?  Maybe.  I only forwarded to cops, so maybe not.



I know I have some photos of scenes/situations from when I was an actively serving EMT, mostly because I have a morbid curiosity and most of us in that profession are accused of having a morbid sense of anything anyhow.  But, also, alot of photos that have been taken by us civil servants at scene have been used- at least as far as I have seen them used- in training situations.  One of my paramedic instructors is the coroner for one of our counties here and he would bring in his "work" from time to time and explain the scene/situation and then have us comment and tell him how we would react if that had been our scene.  As far as the photos I have, I would never think of divulging those publicly because one you never know who those might offend might not offend and two it's just out of respect for the dead or even the living victims.


Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
-Albert Einstein

Shea_and_miss_anya_max50

236 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

cntymnty says ...



You cannot really stop people from taking pics. Especially with their cell phones. The key is effective and complete scene management. If people can't get close enought then they have no picture. The ACLU jerks would cry "freedom of the press" and other excuses.


The funny thing is that we have gotten in trouble more than once at fatals, when the looky loos insist on looking and then phone in a complaint because "little Johnny" saw a dead person.


The don't look, stupid and shield your precious cargo from the harsh realitys of life.


Also, Chimp, at least here, we don't dare try and take someone's camera or film.



You make an excellent point!  Especially about Johnny Looker wanting to get a looksie and then complaining about Johnny Jr. having nightmares because he saw a dead body.  Why not just show the kid a Freddy Krueger movie instead of reality?


Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
-Albert Einstein

P6180123_max50

102 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

We had a fatality on base couple of years ago.  Good thing about being on a military installation is that we can take your cameras and cellphones and destroy any and all pictures.  Of course when you're perimeter has personnel armed with M4's and one with a 249 you tend to get your point across.

Fpd_badge_final2_max50

150 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

shepherdg says ...



We had a fatality on base couple of years ago.  Good thing about being on a military installation is that we can take your cameras and cellphones and destroy any and all pictures.  Of course when you're perimeter has personnel armed with M4's and one with a 249 you tend to get your point across.



LOL I agree,


When I went through the reserve academy they said take there camera or phone or whatever it is and use it as evidence or tell them to scat before you take there stuff

P6180123_max50

102 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

Sometimes I wonder about the transition from military to civilian life....

Monkey_shocked_face_max50

867 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

Oh I didn't say I would take their phones, cameras or film illegally.  I'm just saying they wouldn't have any pictures to take with them that's all ......  There are several options though like, you are intefering with a possible criminal investigation so delete them or I will, or Now I have to seize your phone, camera, etc as evidence for my investigation unless you delete them.  Plus I have a special way with people, which some may know from reading my troll posts, and we will just leave it at that.  


I am a fatal accident investigator and have seen my share of death, more so at my old PD.  People were dropping around me so frequently for a while that nobody wanted to work with me or ride with me and I have taken plenty of photos at accidents, suicides, suspicious deaths, etc.  All of them were evidentuary and never, ever did I take souvenier pics.  No matter what the cause or manner of death, the victim deserves better than that especially from us. 


I know it is done but I won't do it and I don't agree with it.  I was on a fatal pedestrian MVA about 2 months ago where a 21 yr old was struck by a car.  Sadly I have known the victim since he was a little guy and am friends with his mother.  Other guys not knowing this and me being 1st on scene, they asked if I was able to snap a cellphone pic.  I don't think any of them will ever ask me that question again.  Of course I know this was normal human curiosity along with the added touch of being cops but I don't go for it and I certainly wouldn't tolerate it on a scene from anybody because it's just wrong.  Looking at evidence pics in the case is one thing, but taking photos just to spread around is immoral and an embarassment to us and the victim's families.   I will and have done just about everything else and will make a joke about just about any other topic but this isn't one of them.


Police work- the greatest show on earth and my team always wins!!!
Tulips and Trolls- one in the same but without them what fun would I have?

Ou_sooners_max50

616 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted 2 months ago

 

Excellent post, Chimp.  I recently watched a news program (can't remember which one) and one segment was about a family whose daughter had been killed in a very bad, high speed accident.  They said the girl had been at least partially decapitated and not only were the photos on several websites, but some sick people had been sending the photos in emails to the family business, etc.  The family worked with an agency to get the photos offline, but as soon as one site pulled them, they showed up on another, etc.  The familly was distraught.

Ou_sooners_max50

616 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Aw c'mon!  Nobody else has any interest in this topic? 

Thread_hijacker_pic_max50

1093 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Shell,


I know that while the press has their job, I don't always have to like it. Back when I worked security at the county hospital, we used to get all kinds of "high profile" or "newsworthy" patients, especially trauma stuff.  I got to be on camera a lot back then....I "specialized" in waiting until the cameras were rolling (when I couldn't keep them away) and then getting right in front of the camera with my back to the camera, so that all they could see was a big tan blob in the way. I got to piss off a lot of cameramen that way and after awhile, if they saw me heading their way, they'd have to back up to try and get their shots.... the more that they complained about it, the happier my boss was .  Once I even had to get into an ambulance, where 2 kids had been transported, and sit with one and CLOSE the ambo doors, because the one child I was with was stable, but the other was critical {didn't make it} and the camera guy actually walked up to the back of the ambo and started to film this poor scared kid....so I did my thing, blocked the shot, got in and closed the ambo and kept the kid calm for the 2 mins while waiting for the paramedics to come back.... {it was not unusual for us do stand by like that, since we were BLS-eliminated any "patient abandonment" issues}


I'm not "really" a troll....I just love changing my avatar... because...
Psychotics build castles in the air, Neurotics live in those castles, and Psychiatrists collect the rent.

Dapd2_0_max50

514 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

It is going to continue to happen and there isn't really much that can be done about it.


"Relax, the handcuffs are tight because they're new. They'll stretch out after you wear them awhile."

Ou_sooners_max50

616 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

I like that answer Mike (pickle).  I don't know if I would want to be known as the big tan blob, but... 


 


And Trace, I know it's going to happen, but what do you think about it?  Do you think the people who put this stuff in circulation are low-lifes, just trying to educate, what?  I'm just trying to get a good discussion going.  I have forwarded such photos to cops that I know, but no one else.

Dapd2_0_max50

514 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

shellgame says ...



And Trace, I know it's going to happen, but what do you think about it?  Do you think the people who put this stuff in circulation are low-lifes, just trying to educate, what?  



Honestly, since we all know it'll never stop, I don't think about it much. However, it could be both useful and harmful at the same time.


Sure, you're going to have the ones that will exploit it. Yet, just one gruesome photograph, may make that one individual think twice about doing something as stupid as driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs...


 


"Relax, the handcuffs are tight because they're new. They'll stretch out after you wear them awhile."

Ou_sooners_max50

616 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

Excellent point.  I'm all for the ounce of prevention thing and some people do need to see the graphic reality.  I don't know about the "for profit" websites, though.

Thumbnailcax1n50i_max50

689 posts

    

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

trace1 says ...



shellgame says ...



And Trace, I know it's going to happen, but what do you think about it?  Do you think the people who put this stuff in circulation are low-lifes, just trying to educate, what?  



Honestly, since we all know it'll never stop, I don't think about it much. However, it could be both useful and harmful at the same time.


Sure, you're going to have the ones that will exploit it. Yet, just one gruesome photograph, may make that one individual think twice about doing something as stupid as driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs...


 



I have to agree with Trace.  It will happen inspite of how tight the scene might be.  And it might work both ways...  Kinda like the old B&W "Death on the Highways" movies we had to watch in high school Driver Ed Class.  Those were certainly graphic enough...  Maybe someone might think twice before they do something dumb [........nawwwww]


My belief though is that no matter how much of a putz the person may have been in life, they are still due some measure of dignity in death.  Those pictures should remain in the investigator files or ME files.  They don't need to be shopped around the internet.


Don't sweat the petty things...and don't pet the sweaty things
Come to the dark side...WE have cookies!
Old age and treachery will always beat youth and exuberance

Me_max50

409 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

The agency I worked for we had a good working relationship with the media. Sometimes they got to the scene before we did and would start snapping photos the good thing was the photographer would share those photos with us. We had a a tv news crew in our town that helped alot by showing up and video taping some scenes then giving us a copy for evidence.


Life isn't about how to survive the storm, but how to dance in the rain.

Ou_sooners_max50

616 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

It sounds like your news station wasn't a "If it bleeds, it leads" type of station.  If they took video, did they show the really graphic stuff on the air?  I agree that they all deserve to have as much dignity in their deaths as possible.  It's kind of hard to have that when some internet site is showing full-color close-ups of the mangled bodies...

Me_max50

409 posts

back to top
Rate

Rated 0 | Posted about 1 month ago

 

shellgame says ...



It sounds like your news station wasn't a "If it bleeds, it leads" type of station.  If they took video, did they show the really graphic stuff on the air?  I agree that they all deserve to have as much dignity in their deaths as possible.  It's kind of hard to have that when some internet site is showing full-color close-ups of the mangled bodies...



No they didnt show anything graphic on the air.


Life isn't about how to survive the storm, but how to dance in the rain.