General Forums >> The Lobby >> Teachers with firearms

+3

Teachers with firearms

2,815 Views
256 Replies Flag as inappropriate
Photo_user_blank_big

17 posts

back to top

Posted 3 months ago

 

I just saw a news report on NBC that talked about a Town near Wichita Falls in TX that is going to let certain members of its high school's staff, not just the on campus officer, carry guns on campus and at school events, their reasoning was that they figured it would take police 30 min or more to get to them if an incident did occur. I thought "Well thats good." at first, but then i thought, what if the teachers arent properly trained with their weapons? Wouldnt they just make things worse?


What do you guys and gals think about this?

Pizza_pickle_max50

1233 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

Texas = Guns.... I got no problem with teachers packin' heat.... with the "sport" of school shootings it should make some wack jobs think twice...


I'm not "really" a troll....I just love changing my avatar... because...
Psychotics build castles in the air, Neurotics live in those castles, and Psychiatrists collect the rent.....I keep hitting the "escape" key, but I'm still HERE!

Ksp_bulldog_remastered_jpeg_normal_normal_max50

8878 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

With proper training and testing I would support it.


40 hours in firearms at least, shoot no shoot scenarios, training would have to be changed for armed staff members in response to active shooter.


Pain is weakness leaving the body.

Obstacles are what we see when we take our eyes off the goal.

Photo_user_blank_big

17 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

I agree with the both of you, but still, teachers arent really well known for their cool heads in combat. If the shooter was a student, in a high school with 3000 kids, picking out the correct target may pose a problem to someone with no real combat/self defense situation experience. I think that they should allow them to carry, yes, but i think they should also bring in more LEO's to patrol the school, rather than just leaving the task of school defense to possibly inexperienced civilians.

Ksp_bulldog_remastered_jpeg_normal_normal_max50

8878 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

gibbs1189 says ...



I agree with the both of you, but still, teachers arent really well known for their cool heads in combat. If the shooter was a student, in a high school with 3000 kids, picking out the correct target may pose a problem to someone with no real combat/self defense situation experience. I think that they should allow them to carry, yes, but i think they should also bring in more LEO's to patrol the school, rather than just leaving the task of school defense to possibly inexperienced civilians.



Hence the proper training and qualification. If they can't pass the training then they would not be armed.


Pain is weakness leaving the body.

Obstacles are what we see when we take our eyes off the goal.

Photo_user_blank_big

17 posts

back to top
+1

Rated +1 | Posted 3 months ago

 

KSP494 says ...



gibbs1189 says ...



I agree with the both of you, but still, teachers arent really well known for their cool heads in combat. If the shooter was a student, in a high school with 3000 kids, picking out the correct target may pose a problem to someone with no real combat/self defense situation experience. I think that they should allow them to carry, yes, but i think they should also bring in more LEO's to patrol the school, rather than just leaving the task of school defense to possibly inexperienced civilians.



Hence the proper training and qualification. If they can't pass the training then they would not be armed.



Right, but what im saying is that maybe training wouldnt be enough. You are a LEO, and i am not (yet anyway), so you obviously have more experience on these kinds of matters, dealing with shootings, combat/defense training, hell, i cant even lawfully carry a gun yet, so maybe i should just go with you on this one, but i still think that just training and range/target shooting and drills wouldnt really make them ready for a situation that called for them to shoot at, or kill a child, possibly one of their own students, especially when that person could be in a huge crowd of other innocent students, or if the teacher just barely passed the training course, just enough to carry the weapon. When the day comes, will he/she be ready?

Ksp_bulldog_remastered_jpeg_normal_normal_max50

8878 posts

back to top
+1

Rated +1 | Posted 3 months ago

 

gibbs1189 says ...



KSP494 says ...



gibbs1189 says ...



I agree with the both of you, but still, teachers arent really well known for their cool heads in combat. If the shooter was a student, in a high school with 3000 kids, picking out the correct target may pose a problem to someone with no real combat/self defense situation experience. I think that they should allow them to carry, yes, but i think they should also bring in more LEO's to patrol the school, rather than just leaving the task of school defense to possibly inexperienced civilians.



Hence the proper training and qualification. If they can't pass the training then they would not be armed.



Right, but what im saying is that maybe training wouldnt be enough. You are a LEO, and i am not (yet anyway), so you obviously have more experience on these kinds of matters, dealing with shootings, combat/defense training, hell, i cant even lawfully carry a gun yet, so maybe i should just go with you on this one, but i still think that just training and range/target shooting and drills wouldnt really make them ready for a situation that called for them to shoot at, or kill a child, possibly one of their own students, especially when that person could be in a huge crowd of other innocent students, or if the teacher just barely passed the training course, just enough to carry the weapon. When the day comes, will he/she be ready?



OK well then what makes a rookie cop any more qualified?


Pain is weakness leaving the body.

Obstacles are what we see when we take our eyes off the goal.

Wolf_max50

488 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

KSP494 says ...



gibbs1189 says ...



KSP494 says ...



gibbs1189 says ...



I agree with the both of you, but still, teachers arent really well known for their cool heads in combat. If the shooter was a student, in a high school with 3000 kids, picking out the correct target may pose a problem to someone with no real combat/self defense situation experience. I think that they should allow them to carry, yes, but i think they should also bring in more LEO's to patrol the school, rather than just leaving the task of school defense to possibly inexperienced civilians.



Hence the proper training and qualification. If they can't pass the training then they would not be armed.



Right, but what im saying is that maybe training wouldnt be enough. You are a LEO, and i am not (yet anyway), so you obviously have more experience on these kinds of matters, dealing with shootings, combat/defense training, hell, i cant even lawfully carry a gun yet, so maybe i should just go with you on this one, but i still think that just training and range/target shooting and drills wouldnt really make them ready for a situation that called for them to shoot at, or kill a child, possibly one of their own students, especially when that person could be in a huge crowd of other innocent students, or if the teacher just barely passed the training course, just enough to carry the weapon. When the day comes, will he/she be ready?



OK well then what makes a rookie cop any more qualified?


A rookie Officer has a mindset that has been pounded into them.  A teacher has not.  Personally taking out a human being with a firearm is something most people give about 3 minutes of thought to in their lifetime and it's most likely during an action movie on the widescreen... Officers think this EVERY 3 minutes or so.  My Traning Officer beat that mindset into me all the time during training, "He might pull a gun.  What's your backdrop?  Where's your cover? " etc. etc. 


The last thing I would want is my kid getting acidentally winged or worse -killed, by some school teacher who has no idea of the concepts involved in engaging an active shooter.  At the most I would say give them Tasers w/ training.  We're taught to meet deadly force with deadly force but a school teacher does not have the training/firearm discipline we do.  Not to mention students can get a hold of their firearms about as easy as they can.  If they can't hit their target with a Taser then they sure as hell have no business shooting their target with a firearm.


Firearms training on any mass scale would be a joke.  Who's going to qualify a school teacher to the point where they can stand in civil court and say, "Yes your Honor, I did train this person to carry/handle firearms and I found them 100% capable to do so.  We spent 15 minutes discussing the idea of a backdrop of 60 running 12 year olds but how was I supposed to know they were daydreaming at that point of the training?".  If a school system feels it necessary to arm their teachers then they should have already come to the realization that they need to hire on sworn school PD Officers to keep their school(s) safe. 


Ksp_bulldog_remastered_jpeg_normal_normal_max50

8878 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

THIRDWATCHNORTH says ...



KSP494 says ...



gibbs1189 says ...



KSP494 says ...



gibbs1189 says ...



I agree with the both of you, but still, teachers arent really well known for their cool heads in combat. If the shooter was a student, in a high school with 3000 kids, picking out the correct target may pose a problem to someone with no real combat/self defense situation experience. I think that they should allow them to carry, yes, but i think they should also bring in more LEO's to patrol the school, rather than just leaving the task of school defense to possibly inexperienced civilians.



Hence the proper training and qualification. If they can't pass the training then they would not be armed.



Right, but what im saying is that maybe training wouldnt be enough. You are a LEO, and i am not (yet anyway), so you obviously have more experience on these kinds of matters, dealing with shootings, combat/defense training, hell, i cant even lawfully carry a gun yet, so maybe i should just go with you on this one, but i still think that just training and range/target shooting and drills wouldnt really make them ready for a situation that called for them to shoot at, or kill a child, possibly one of their own students, especially when that person could be in a huge crowd of other innocent students, or if the teacher just barely passed the training course, just enough to carry the weapon. When the day comes, will he/she be ready?



OK well then what makes a rookie cop any more qualified?


A rookie Officer has a mindset that has been pounded into them.  A teacher has not.  Personally taking out a human being with a firearm is something most people give about 3 minutes of thought to in their lifetime and it's most likely during an action movie on the widescreen... Officers think this EVERY 3 minutes or so.  My Traning Officer beat that mindset into me all the time during training, "He might pull a gun.  What's your backdrop?  Where's your cover? " etc. etc. 


The last thing I would want is my kid getting acidentally winged or worse -killed, by some school teacher who has no idea of the concepts involved in engaging an active shooter.  At the most I would say give them Tasers w/ training.  We're taught to meet deadly force with deadly force but a school teacher does not have the training/firearm discipline we do.  Not to mention students can get a hold of their firearms about as easy as they can.  If they can't hit their target with a Taser then they sure as hell have no business shooting their target with a firearm.


Firearms training on any mass scale would be a joke.  Who's going to qualify a school teacher to the point where they can stand in civil court and say, "Yes your Honor, I did train this person to carry/handle firearms and I found them 100% capable to do so.  We spent 15 minutes discussing the idea of a backdrop of 60 running 12 year olds but how was I supposed to know they were daydreaming at that point of the training?".  If a school system feels it necessary to arm their teachers then they should have already come to the realization that they need to hire on sworn school PD Officers to keep their school(s) safe. 



Yet daily we put people through an 8 hour course and give them a license to carry a concealed deadly weapon. I think with 40 hours of training from a state certified instructor which includes scenarios and shoot no shoot situations and law enforcement qualification arming a couple individuals in schools would not be bad. If they don't make it through the training then they don't carry. Even make them go through additional background checks and psychological testing. Otherwise what is your fix for waiting for police to get there? What is your acceptable loss of students before I make it across a county to get to a school? Who is going to make those notifications to the family? Which is the bigger liability, having some of the staff armed for an incident which may never happen in their school or having an active shooter in a school and it taking me or the Sheriff's Dept. 20-30 minutes to get there, how many will be dead by then? This is my opinion I'm sorry that it differs from yours.


 


Pain is weakness leaving the body.

Obstacles are what we see when we take our eyes off the goal.

Hulk_max50

637 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

KSP494 says ...



THIRDWATCHNORTH says ...



KSP494 says ...



gibbs1189 says ...



KSP494 says ...



gibbs1189 says ...



I agree with the both of you, but still, teachers arent really well known for their cool heads in combat. If the shooter was a student, in a high school with 3000 kids, picking out the correct target may pose a problem to someone with no real combat/self defense situation experience. I think that they should allow them to carry, yes, but i think they should also bring in more LEO's to patrol the school, rather than just leaving the task of school defense to possibly inexperienced civilians.



Hence the proper training and qualification. If they can't pass the training then they would not be armed.



Right, but what im saying is that maybe training wouldnt be enough. You are a LEO, and i am not (yet anyway), so you obviously have more experience on these kinds of matters, dealing with shootings, combat/defense training, hell, i cant even lawfully carry a gun yet, so maybe i should just go with you on this one, but i still think that just training and range/target shooting and drills wouldnt really make them ready for a situation that called for them to shoot at, or kill a child, possibly one of their own students, especially when that person could be in a huge crowd of other innocent students, or if the teacher just barely passed the training course, just enough to carry the weapon. When the day comes, will he/she be ready?



OK well then what makes a rookie cop any more qualified?


A rookie Officer has a mindset that has been pounded into them.  A teacher has not.  Personally taking out a human being with a firearm is something most people give about 3 minutes of thought to in their lifetime and it's most likely during an action movie on the widescreen... Officers think this EVERY 3 minutes or so.  My Traning Officer beat that mindset into me all the time during training, "He might pull a gun.  What's your backdrop?  Where's your cover? " etc. etc. 


The last thing I would want is my kid getting acidentally winged or worse -killed, by some school teacher who has no idea of the concepts involved in engaging an active shooter.  At the most I would say give them Tasers w/ training.  We're taught to meet deadly force with deadly force but a school teacher does not have the training/firearm discipline we do.  Not to mention students can get a hold of their firearms about as easy as they can.  If they can't hit their target with a Taser then they sure as hell have no business shooting their target with a firearm.


Firearms training on any mass scale would be a joke.  Who's going to qualify a school teacher to the point where they can stand in civil court and say, "Yes your Honor, I did train this person to carry/handle firearms and I found them 100% capable to do so.  We spent 15 minutes discussing the idea of a backdrop of 60 running 12 year olds but how was I supposed to know they were daydreaming at that point of the training?".  If a school system feels it necessary to arm their teachers then they should have already come to the realization that they need to hire on sworn school PD Officers to keep their school(s) safe. 



Yet daily we put people through an 8 hour course and give them a license to carry a concealed deadly weapon. I think with 40 hours of training from a state certified instructor which includes scenarios and shoot no shoot situations and law enforcement qualification arming a couple individuals in schools would not be bad. If they don't make it through the training then they don't carry. Even make them go through additional background checks and psychological testing. Otherwise what is your fix for waiting for police to get there? What is your acceptable loss of students before I make it across a county to get to a school? Who is going to make those notifications to the family? Which is the bigger liability, having some of the staff armed for an incident which may never happen in their school or having an active shooter in a school and it taking me or the Sheriff's Dept. 20-30 minutes to get there, how many will be dead by then? This is my opinion I'm sorry that it differs from yours.


 



An 8hr course for a CCW permit. In Florida it's 4 and bearly that depending on the instructor.


You both have valid points on the subject. I do think that it is a sensitive issue though. Even with 40hrs training. Teachers have a certain care and nuturing spirit when it comes to there students. Alot of them treat some students as there own children. That cannot be taken out of them, regardless of how many drills and scenarios are instilled into them. I do not think that some of the teachers are qualified to carry in that regards. It's an emotionally traumatic situation for them and may cause a moment of hesitation which could only lead to making a bad situation worse. Can it work possibly? Will it work with minimal civil liability? Who knows!


"Amateurs talk hardware. Professionals talk software. It doesn't matter what's in your hand or between your legs. It matters what's in your heart and in your head." - Lt. Col. Dave Grossman

Revan_max50

364 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

I'm going to have to agree with KSP. The fact they have some training is good enough for a normal citizen to carry and use a weapon, so it should be good enough for a teacher. Especially if they get more training than the average citizen. But another fact is, if the teachers have weapons, what retard at school would try to start something, knowing he might get shot? Teachers having a gun would allow quicker responses in a shooting situation and probably prevent them from occurring. As well as decrease other school related crimes dramatically. If my teacher had a gun, I wouldn't pull any sh*t in their class. I'd shut up, pay attention, and learn, so they have no reason to get upset with me.

Dr

542 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

I read on yahoo (I think) that they (the teachers) WILL have to pass a qualification course, If I find it or any other articles should I post them?


Have you hugged your machine gun today?

Nite_blues_max50

2650 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

with the proper training and qualifications met i am all for it.  on a side note, its all fun and games until one of the students gets upset and starts shooting up a class then they blame the schools and teacher for having a gun in school.   kinds of like damned if you do and damned if you dont. 


LIFE'S JOURNEY IS NOT TO ARRIVE AT THE GRAVE SAFELY IN A WELL PRESERVED BODY BUT RATHER TO SLIDE IN SIDEWAYS, TOTALLY WORN OUT, SHOUTING "HOLY SHIT....WHAT A RIDE"

Csi_squirrle_sq90_1__max50

336 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

gibbs1189 says ...



I agree with the both of you, but still, teachers arent really well known for their cool heads in combat. If the shooter was a student, in a high school with 3000 kids, picking out the correct target may pose a problem to someone with no real combat/self defense situation experience. I think that they should allow them to carry, yes, but i think they should also bring in more LEO's to patrol the school, rather than just leaving the task of school defense to possibly inexperienced civilians.


I think KSP is on the mark as far as required training ect.  I would place a couple of more stipulations onto this idea. Number one is that the teacher must carry concealed.  Number two is that it will not be common knowledge who is packing.  I submitt the principal, asst. principal and school resourse officer should know but that is it.  It would be an additional deterrent because students and would be attackers would not know where the threat to their plan might be coming from.  As far as the teachers not haveing coool heads ect, ect.  I am willing to bet that there are some former LEO's and former combat military folks teaching school.  And of course as KSP rightfully stated training is the key.  I think that any citizen who takes the initiative should be allowed to carry concealed.  Teacher's however need a little more training in threat recognition and shoot/don't shoot senerios.


 


 


Rleeermy_max50

783 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

Well, being a school cop.  I don't think that is a good idea.  Students, teachers  and other school employees could very well be the offender(s). I for one do not want to enter a school not knowing how many guns are in there and who has one (But to think about that statement, our officers do that everyday).  We arrested a Principal for threating a custodian with a firearm on campus.  We arrest students, teachers and other school employees often. 


These people are human and simply being in a school setting does not make them different from others.  In my opinion if anyone on campus who needed to be armed other than the District's police is the Principal,  Asst Principal(s)  and select  school security  and only after extensive training conducted  by the police and a phycological exam.  My school district has many ex-military and cops working as teachers.  I am only thinking about the environment I work in. 


The response time for Miami-Dade Schools in an emergency most times is less than 5 minutes due to officers being on campus and the local jurisdictions ability to respond if they are closer then we are for schools that do not have an assigned officer.  I can not speak for other school districts.

Riflepic1_max50

613 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

I think it's a good idea, but see problems with it getting passed and approved. Quite often, school administrators are very liberal. That alone would stop the process. Then throw the parents of these kids in the mix, knowing their kid's teacher has a gun.....i see lots of problems with that.


With the proper training, I would totally agree with it. It's no different than allowing pilots and such to carry weapons on planes. People argued it for a long time, but now there are some that do carry. KSP hit it right....you need tactical training, shoot/no-shoot scenarios, and maybe even some reality based training such as active shooter or simunitions training.


"People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. "

Wtc-2004-memorial_max50

465 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

I agree it a decent idea as long as the teachers are trained and qualified..I worked in a HS and the problem I see is when a fight breaks out and you are wrestling with several students fighting if the weapon falls to the ground anyone can grab it so I hope the weapon is locked in a secure place where it is obtained only if a situation arises.


" IF YOU HEAR THE SHOT IT MEANS I MISSED, I'M THE RANGE OFFICER I DON'T MISS"

McCAIN / PALIN USA'S ONLY HOPE NOW DASHED GOD BLESS US ALL

Cupid1_max50

235 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

  I was a School resource Officer for 2 years.. I think that if the teachers are registered with the local PD and SO; attend a mini academy to include use of force/deadly force training; Criminal law related to use of force and deadly force;  DT training for firearm retention and defense; 40 hour firearms training; Bi-annual firearms quals; and active shooter training; then it would be a good idea.


  The academy would be three weeks to one month tops.. The local PD and SO will get to know the teacher and would pass on valuable training information and tips as to what to look for and how to handle deadly force situations.. One thing I learned while interacting with the teachers in the break room.. Most of them are sicker than we are.. You could learn a lot about genocide techniques from a 6th and 7th grade math teacher..


God invented whiskey to prevent the Irish from ruling the World....
Train the impossible so the impossible never happens..

Chuck_max50

16 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

I agree with it if the Teacher volunteers, passes a psyche evaluation, safety and active shooter courses.  The firearms should be concealed at all times and the names of armed Staff should be known only to those who have a need.  The presence alone would deter most and should the need arise lives could be saved.

Csi_squirrle_sq90_1__max50

336 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

The response time for Miami-Dade Schools in an emergency most time is less than 5 minutes due to officers being on campus and the local jurisdictions ability to respond if they are closer.  I can not speak for other school districts


 


Five minutes may as well be five hours.  That is the whole point.  Any study of a school shooting incident, Colombine, Jonesborough, ect. will show that the majority of the time the event is over in less than three minutes.  Five minute response will just allow you to pick up the pieces.  Look at Virginia Tec.  They had two SWAT teams on campus due to the first incident.  It really didn't help much.  The reason to consider armed teachers it two fold.  First and foremost it may put someone at the point of contact when the incident begins.  The second, and I believe more important, reason is as a deterrent.  If these little assholes know they may face immediate armed resistance they will be far less likely to choose their school as a target for their destruction.  If the protocal is to designate the principal as the only armed teacher then you loose any benefit. In Colombine, for example the school resourse officer was on campus.  He was sitting in his car eating lunch.  Might the perpetrators known that he did this giving them the opportunity?  I know this is concept is full of controversy so discussion is good.  As far as everyone's concerns I remember when Floriday passed their CCW law the press was all over the belief that it would become like the wild west with shoot outs on every street.  That did not come to pass.

Rleeermy_max50

783 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

You left a few things out.  In those situations the police response was timely but what they did when they got there was not. Hence active shooter training.  Once you police a school you will be better able to see my point.  Car alarms don't stop cars from being broken into but we have them and a list of other things that are supposed to deter criminals and maniacs but they still do what they do.  Did you read that we arrested a Principal for pulling a firearm on another employee?


Let the Police police and the teachers teach.  As I posted in my previous post I think I said if I had to chose those would be the folks I would select and if I did not then that was what I meant.  Anytime the police is needed in an emergency time stands still. But they get there quickly most of the time.  It's what is done by them after arrival.  This will never be allowed anyway.  For many many reasons.  Can you say LIABILITY!


Also reference Florida the law was passed did violent crime go down, NO it went up! Burglary and stolen firearms also went up.  Now there are even more guns on the street.  Almost everyone you encounter in Miami is armed in some manner or other.  But that is the life style here in Miami-Dade and I chose to help police it. 

W_baldeaglepraypatriotic_lrg_max50

94 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

I agree police should do police work and teachers should teach.  Has anyone thought of who is going to know who i armed.  We all know that when you get on sean you are looking for that shooter.  What happens when you come aroundd the corner and there is a teacher standing there with a gun and the teacher turns and gets nervous and pulls that triger. 


I do agree that if they go through with this then there should be aleast 30 days of tranning which includes active shooter and the laws.  I would rather just keep them out of the teachers hands and keep then in the trained perfesonal who know what they are doing. 

Pizza_pickle_max50

1233 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

snhadley says ...



<snip>Let the Police police and the teachers teach. <snip>


 



I can understand your sentiments based upon your training and experiences, however if we take that very same principle we could apply it to almost anything and it makes for a PERFECT excuse to completely outlaw and seize all firearms from civillians. We are talking about the prospect of attempting to deter potential mass violence and give those willing (in theory) to go into harms way as volunteers to protect the defenseless.... It kinda sounds like the Federal Flight Deck Officer program for arming commercial pilots doesn't it ? And what more valuable resource is there to our country than our children in what is already publicly known as "target rich environments" since schools are already gun-free zones and therefore "safe".


I will however acknowledge that in most places folks feel the same about schools as they do about hospitals and that "nothing bad can or will happen here" so we don't need armed proetction against 2 legged wolves.


-btw- if you aren't already aware of my personal situation involving guns & kids check my profile....who knows maybe I'm just a "F" d up psychotic idiot rambling... 


I'm not "really" a troll....I just love changing my avatar... because...
Psychotics build castles in the air, Neurotics live in those castles, and Psychiatrists collect the rent.....I keep hitting the "escape" key, but I'm still HERE!

The-runaway-stretched-canvas-print-c13214034_max50

142 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

KSP494 says ...



With proper training and testing I would support it.


40 hours in firearms at least, shoot no shoot scenarios, training would have to be changed for armed staff members in response to active shooter.



Bump


Romans 13:4 "For he is God's minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil
The task ahead of you is never as great as the power behind you

Gardenia_max50

372 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

I've been teaching for 18 years, both at the elementary level and more recently at the junior high school level.  I do not think teachers should be allowed to carry firearms, but if it does come about I would hope the few that are chosen to carry firearms would be VERY well trained and would work closely with the local PD. 


"Courage is endurance for one moment more."

Dscn3439_max50

115 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

 It's only viewed differently because it's teachers and a school full of kids that are in consideration.  It's the same difference as any civilian carrying a gun. There are pros and cons, as with anything, it's a matter of determining what outcome would be better, but that's not even certain. Training is a DEFINITE should they allow it.


BTW-there's no training in GA. They run a background and allow you to have a permit. So not all citizens are put through any training. 

Rleeermy_max50

783 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted 3 months ago

 

Ina_Pickle says ...



snhadley says ...



<snip>Let the Police police and the teachers teach. <snip>


 



I can understand your sentiments based upon your training and experiences, however if we take that very same principle we could apply it to almost anything and it makes for a PERFECT excuse to completely outlaw and seize all firearms from civillians. We are talking about the prospect of attempting to deter potential mass violence and give those willing (in theory) to go into harms way as volunteers to protect the defenseless.... It kinda sounds like the Federal Flight Deck Officer program for arming commercial pilots doesn't it ? And what more valuable resource is there to our country than our children in what is already publicly known as "target rich environments" since schools are already gun-free zones and therefore "safe".


I will however acknowledge that in most places folks feel the same about schools as they do about hospitals and that "nothing bad can or will happen here" so we don't need armed proetction against 2 legged wolves.


-btw- if you aren't already aware of my personal situation involving guns & kids check my profile....who knows maybe I'm just a "F" d up psychotic idiot rambling... 


 


 


Brother, I read your profile and I am very sorry about your losses.  I too had a child who took one of my firearms and shot himself. The only differences in the outcome was that my weapon  was secured in a locked bedroom and high up on a shelf in a closet.  He broke in to my bedroom and took one of my weapons and shot himself accidentally.  Fortunately, he did not die and I nor my wife who is also a LEO did not get charged.  I now have a Bank Safe to secure all of my firearms.  I hope someone learns a lesson from our situation. 


This discussion has nothing to do with gun control it's about teachers with firearms in a school.  The perfect situation would to have an armed teacher present when a bad guy displays or starts shooting.  The teacher shoots the subject case over.  It does not happen that way.  Teachers have many responsibilities in a school setting one of which is to protect the students in their classroom and not abandon them to go play Cop.  No offense to teachers my sister is one.  You don't have to pass a phycological exam to be a teacher only a background check.  I have taken teachers who have had nervous breakdowns to mental health facilities.  Who were drunk in the classroom.  Who have raped students. I could go on and on.  Everything that goes on on the street occurs in our schools.

The Federal Flight Deck Officer Program you're comparing apples to oranges.  One pilot and possiblly an Air Marshall or an LEO on official buisness.  Passengers on an enclosed aircaft.  The Pilot and Air Marshall know each other has a firearm and they know who the LEO on duty is.  Anyone else with one is the target.


We have schools with over 5,000 students and staff.  I work for a school district.  Bad things happen there everyday. Hospitals are they to arm the Doctors, Nurses, and Staff.  What about Churches Arm the Pastor too!  Oh by the way I carry my weapon concealed at church too.  You never know where an idiot will show up.  But I am a trained professional. 


Arming Teachers sounds good in theory, but this is a Law enforcement nightmare.  What happens when a Teacher shoots a child by accident or has an accidental discharge in the classroom.  Law Enforcement Officers know of some other LEO who had an AD and they are trained professionals. You have no idea what the repercussions of that will be.


I don't have the time to figure out if the person  with a hand gun  in a school or anywhere else  is a teacher or not.  I would lose  precious time disarming or   possible killing this person if they do not respond properly to  my commands or does some unintentional overt act.


Tell me how many times have you seached a school for an armed subject or been involved in a school related shooting.  I have on numerous occasions.  Try it one time and your brain child of arming Teachers will go away quickly.  I don't think you are an idiot. I think your response like many others are based on emotion without thinking the issue through! I'm done with this one!  Thank care and good luck!

0719082143a_1__max50

3 posts

back to top
Rate